Emotion-Induced Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Working Memory Improvement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63313/AJET.9071Keywords:
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Working Memory, Emotion Induction, PANAS, 2-Back TaskAbstract
Objective: To examine the effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on working memory under different emotion-induced states. Method: A total of 180 healthy right-handed adults aged 18-35 years were assigned to a 3 (emotion: happy, neutral, sad) × 4 (stimulation: sham, 1.0 mA, 1.5 mA, 2.0 mA) between-subjects design. Emotions were induced by pictures or video clips and verified using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Participants completed a letter 2-back task before and after stimulation. Accuracy and correct-trial reaction time were analyzed. Results: Baseline accuracy did not differ across emotion conditions, whereas baseline reaction time showed a modest emotion effect. Active anodal tDCS generally increased accuracy and reduced reaction time compared with sham stimulation. Stimulation intensity showed significant main effects on both accuracy change and reaction-time change. Emotion showed a significant main effect on reaction-time change, whereas the emotion-by-intensity interaction was not significant. Conclusion: Anodal tDCS may improve working memory across different emotion-induced states. Stimulation intensity appears to be the dominant factor, while emotional state may influence baseline processing speed and the magnitude of behavioral response.
References
[1] Baddeley, A.D. and Hitch, G.J. (1974) Working Memory. In: Bower, G.H., Ed., Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Academic Press, New York, 47-89.
[2] Baddeley, A. (2012) Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1-29.
[3] Martinussen, R., Hayden, J., Hogg-Johnson, S., et al. (2005) A Meta-Analysis of Working Memory Impairments in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44(4), 377-384.
[4] Belleville, S., Chertkow, H. and Gauthier, S. (2007) Working Memory and Control of Attention in Persons with Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment. Neuropsychology, 21(4), 458-469.
[5] Levens, S.M. and Gotlib, I.H. (2010) Updating Positive and Negative Stimuli in Working Memory in Depression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(4), 654-664.
[6] Nitsche, M.A. and Paulus, W. (2000) Excitability Changes Induced in the Human Motor Cortex by Weak Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation. The Journal of Physiology, 527(3), 633-639.
[7] Woods, A.J., Antal, A., Bikson, M., et al. (2016) A Technical Guide to tDCS, and Related Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Tools. Clinical Neurophysiology, 127(2), 1031-1048.
[8] Polanía, R., Nitsche, M.A. and Ruff, C.C. (2018) Studying and Modifying Brain Function with Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation. Nature Neuroscience, 21, 174-187.
[9] Stagg, C.J. and Nitsche, M.A. (2011) Physiological Basis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation. The Neuroscientist, 17, 37-53.
[10] Fregni, F., Boggio, P.S., Nitsche, M., et al. (2005) Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of Prefrontal Cortex Enhances Working Memory. Experimental Brain Research, 166(1), 23-30.
[11] McKendrick, R., Falcone, B., Scheldrup, M., et al. (2020) Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Baseline and Slope of Prefrontal Cortex Hemodynamics during a Spatial Working Memory Task. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 64.
[12] Yaqub, M.A., Woo, S.W. and Hong, K.S. (2018) Effects of HD-tDCS on Resting-State Functional Connectivity in the Prefrontal Cortex: An fNIRS Study. Complexity, 2018, 1613402.
[13] Hill, A.T., Fitzgerald, P.B. and Hoy, K.E. (2016) Effects of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Working Memory: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Findings from Healthy and Neuropsychiatric Populations. Brain Stimulation, 9(2), 197-208.
[14] Mancuso, L.E., Ilieva, I.P., Hamilton, R.H., et al. (2016) Does Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improve Healthy Working Memory? A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(8), 1063-1089.
[15] Dedoncker, J., Brunoni, A.R., Baeken, C., et al. (2016) A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Healthy and Neuropsychiatric Samples: Influence of Stimulation Parameters. Brain Stimulation, 9, 501-517.
[16] Hoy, K.E., Emonson, M.R., Arnold, S.L., et al. (2013) Testing the Limits: Investigating the Effect of tDCS Dose on Working Memory Enhancement in Healthy Controls. Neuropsychologia, 51(9), 1777-1784.
[17] Brunoni, A.R., Nitsche, M.A., Bolognini, N., et al. (2012) Clinical Research with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Challenges and Future Directions. Brain Stimulation, 5(3), 175-195.
[18] Silvanto, J. and Pascual-Leone, A. (2008) State-Dependency of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Brain Topography, 21, 1-10.
[19] Bergmann, T.O. (2018) Brain State-Dependent Brain Stimulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2108.
[20] Krause, B. and Kadosh, R.C. (2014) Not All Brains Are Created Equal: The Relevance of Individual Differences in Responsiveness to Transcranial Electrical Stimulation. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, 25.
[21] Pessoa, L. (2009) How Do Emotion and Motivation Direct Executive Control? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 160-166.
[22] Dolcos, F. and McCarthy, G. (2006) Brain Systems Mediating Cognitive Interference by Emotional Distraction. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26(7), 2072-2079.
[23] Schweizer, S., Satpute, A.B., Atzil, S., et al. (2019) The Impact of Affective Information on Working Memory: A Pair of Meta-Analytic Reviews of Behavioral and Neuroimaging Evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 145(6), 566-609.
[24] Pe, M.L., Raes, F. and Kuppens, P. (2013) The Cognitive Building Blocks of Emotion Regulation: Ability to Update Working Memory Moderates the Efficacy of Rumination and Reappraisal on Emotion. PLOS ONE, 8(7), e69071.
[25] Watson, D., Clark, L.A. and Tellegen, A. (1988) Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
[26] Huang, L., Yang, T.Z. and Ji, Z.M. (2003) Applicability of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule in a Chinese Population. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 17(1), 54-56. [In Chinese].
[27] Kirchner, W.K. (1958) Age Differences in Short-Term Retention of Rapidly Changing Information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(4), 352-358.
[28] Owen, A.M., McMillan, K.M., Laird, A.R., et al. (2005) N-Back Working Memory Paradigm: A Meta-Analysis of Normative Functional Neuroimaging Studies. Human Brain Mapping, 25(1), 46-59.
[29] Bogdanov, M. and Schwabe, L. (2016) Transcranial Stimulation of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Prevents Stress-Induced Working Memory Deficits. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(4), 1429-1437.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by author(s) and Erytis Publishing Limited
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
