Precise Cultivation of Craftsmanship in Art Literacy Courses for Design Majors within the Context of Generative Design

Authors

  • Lianfan Wu Wenzhou Polytechnic, Wenzhou 325035, China Author
  • Qingyi Liu Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou 362000, China Author
  • Yuxin Zhang Wenzhou Polytechnic, Wenzhou 325035, China Author
  • Huiru Xu Wenzhou Polytechnic, Wenzhou 325035, China Author
  • Liya Wang Wenzhou Polytechnic, Wenzhou 325035, China Author
  • Mengjun Huang Wenzhou Polytechnic, Wenzhou 325035, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63313/IJED.9047

Keywords:

Art literacy course, Craftsmanship, Precise cultivation, design majors, Generative design

Abstract

The widespread application of generative AI is profoundly reshaping the pedagogical landscape for design majors. While significantly boosting efficiency in image acquisition and concept development, it has also exposed students to tendencies such as diminished formal judgment, a weakened sense of physical making (materiality), and superficial cultural expression. Traditional art literacy courses, which rely heavily on artwork appreciation and knowledge trans-mission, are increasingly inadequate for this novel learning paradigm. Grounded in curriculum theory and pedagogical reform, and having defined the generative design educational context, this paper combines literature review with curricu-lum design to analyze the current misalignments in art literacy courses. It fur-ther explores the underlying logic of translating craftsmanship into curriculum objectives, content organization, instructional implementation, and evaluation criteria. The study posits that the core mission of art literacy courses in the generative design era is to rebuild students' foundational, prerequisite judgment in design learning. By mapping the principles of relentless refinement, prag-matic truth-seeking, and principled innovation onto three training dimensions—formal aesthetics, materiality awareness, and cultural understanding—the curriculum establishes a cohesive implementation chain. This chain encom-passes deviation identification, homologous comparison, iterative revision, process documentation, and evidence-based evaluation. Ultimately, the precise cultivation of craftsmanship in art literacy courses can only be realized when it is substantially embedded into the specific cognitive processes through which students observe, evaluate, and revise AI-generated outputs.

References

[1] Fang, C., Zhu, Y., Fang, L., et al. (2025) Generative AI-enhanced Human-AI Collaborative Conceptual Design: A Systematic Literature Review. Design Studies, 97, 101300.

[2] Hwang, Y. and Wu, Y. (2025) Graphic Design Education in the Era of Text-to-Image Generation: Transitioning to Contents Creator. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 44(1), 239-253.

[3] Yu, W.F. (2025) AI as a Co-creator and a Design Material: Transforming the Design Process. Design Studies, 97, 101303.

[4] Yan, L., Greiff, S., Teuber, Z., et al. (2024) Promises and Challenges of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Human Learning. Nature Human Behaviour, 8, 1839-1850.

[5] Cross, N. (1982) Designerly Ways of Knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221-227.

[6] Sennett, R. (2009) The Craftsman. Yale University Press, New Haven.

[7] McCullough, M. (1998) Abstracting Craft: The Practiced Digital Hand. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

[8] Yazici, G. and Dogan, F. (2024) Fostering Metacognition in the Design Studio: The Effect of Minimal Interventions on Architectural Students’ Metacognitive Awareness. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 54, 101651.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-26

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Precise Cultivation of Craftsmanship in Art Literacy Courses for Design Majors within the Context of Generative Design. (2026). International Journal of Educational Development, 2(3), 64-71. https://doi.org/10.63313/IJED.9047