Government Environmental Attention and Urban Carbon Emissions: A Governance-Based Interpretation from the Perspective of Harmonious Human–Nature Coexistence

Authors

  • QiuYi Wang School of International Economics and Trade, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63313/FPM.9005

Keywords:

Governmental Environmental Attention, Urban Carbon Emissions, Local Governance, Environmental Regulation, Low-Carbon Transition

Abstract

In the context of China’s pursuit of the “dual carbon” goals and the broader modernization agenda centered on harmonious coexistence between humanity and nature, the role of local governments in carbon mitigation has become increasingly important. Existing studies have primarily focused on the effectiveness of specific policy instruments, such as environmental regulation, carbon taxation, emissions trading, and fiscal subsidies, while paying comparatively less attention to a more fundamental issue: how local governments’ environmental attention shapes the governance process prior to the implementation of concrete policies. This paper argues that governmental environmental attention should be understood as a prior governance variable that influences policy priorities, resource allocation, enforcement preferences, and ultimately urban carbon emissions. Rather than assuming a simple linear relationship, the paper emphasizes that governmental environmental attention may generate both restraining and promoting effects on carbon emissions through multiple channels, including regulatory constraint, market-based incentives, green investment, industrial restructuring, and governance capacity. These effects are further conditioned by development stage, industrial structure, regional competition, and institutional capacity. The paper therefore proposes a governance-based analytical framework for understanding the complex relationship between governmental environmental attention and urban carbon emissions. Its central argument is that environmental attention matters not because it is merely discursively present in official texts, but because it determines whether environmental concerns are effectively incorporated into local development priorities and transformed into institutionalized governance arrangements.

References

[1] Wu Yanan, Xia Jiechang, Peng Biyu The Impact of Digital Economy on Carbon Emission Intensity of Transportation Industry: Evidence from Chinese Urban Level [J]. Ecological Civilization Research, 2026, (01):33-53.

[2] Jin Wenjie Research on the synergistic effect of "carbon reduction" and "growth" in the dual environment pilot policy [J]. Science and Industry, 2026,26 (02): 282-292

[3] Li Xiang, Li Zhicui, Liu Xiaoping, etc Exploring the spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of carbon emissions in Chinese cities under the background of digital economy empowerment [J]. Gansu Finance, 2025, (11):5-15.

[4] Yu Xiao, Su Ming Market incentive based environmental policies promote the "dual improvement of quantity and quality" of urban green innovation - empirical evidence from China's carbon emission trading pilot program [J]. Chongqing Social Sciences, 2025, (10):150-174.DOI:10.19631/j.cnki.css.2025.010.009.

[5] Wu Yanan Research on the Impact of Digital Economy on Carbon Emission Intensity of Transportation Industry [D]. South China Normal University, 2025. DOI: 10.27154/d.cnki.ghnsu.2025.000089

Downloads

Published

2026-04-10

Issue

Section

Articles