Institutional Empowerment, Technological and Cultural Equity: A Multidimensional Governance Model for University Education to Bridge the Gender Digital Divide

Authors

  • Jie Zhou College of Publishing, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63313/SSH.9049

Keywords:

Gender Digital Divide, Institutional Empowerment, Technological Equity, Multidimensional Governance Model, University Education

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the comprehensive advancement of China’s "Digital China" strategy, the issue of the gender digital divide has become increasingly prominent, manifested in women’s systemic disadvantages in accessing digital skills, opportunities for technology use, and participation in digital occupations. As a core venue for technology dissemination and talent cultivation, universities urgently need to explore a collaborative governance path integrating institutional empowerment and technological equity. This study finds that the gender digital divide in university environments is shaped by the interplay of multiple structural barriers, including institutional, technological, and cultural factors, which demands systematic governance strategies. By systematically analyzing the current status of gender disparities in university digital education, this research constructs a three-dimensional "Institution-Technology-Culture" governance model and proposes a comprehensive governance plan. Drawing on the experience of successful domestic and international cases, it refines replicable governance paths suitable for China’s national conditions, aiming to provide theoretical reference and practical guidance for promoting gender equality in higher education.

References

[1] The Communist Party of China Central Committee, The State Council. (2023) Overall Lay-out Plan for Digital China Construction [EB/OL]. [2023-03-27]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2023-02/27/content_5743484.htm. DOI: None.

[2] Sharma A P, Ojha J K. (2025) Analyzing the gender digital divide through powercube framework[J]. Information Development, 2025, 41(2): 145-162.

[3] Zheng Xinrong, Wu Xiaowei. (2025) Ensuring Every Woman Enjoys Equitable and Quality Education——Progress, Reflections and Prospects of Gender Equality in Education in China Over the Past Five Years[J]. Journal of Shandong Women’s University, 2025, 33(3): 15-24.

[4] Huang Tianyu, Quan Yiyue. (2025) Narrowing the digital divide: The growth and distribu-tional effect of internet use on income in rural China[J]. China Economic Review, 2025, 91: 102387.

[5] Zhang Xiu. (2022) Analysis of Optimization Paths for Gender Equality Education in the Digital Age[J]. Education Teaching Forum, 2022(21): 13-16.

[6] Zhang Wenhui. (2025) Implicit Barriers and Explicit Gaps: An Analysis of the Third-Level Gender Digital Divide on Digital Platforms[J]. Journal of Shandong Women’s University, 2025, 32(2): 78-95.

[7] Wu Menghui. (2025) Cultivation and Development of Female STEM Talents in Germany from the Perspective of the Theory of Planned Behavior[J]. Journal of Comparative Edu-cation, 2025(4): 17-30.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-08

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Institutional Empowerment, Technological and Cultural Equity: A Multidimensional Governance Model for University Education to Bridge the Gender Digital Divide. (2025). Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.63313/SSH.9049