From "Divine Narrative" to "Humanistic Expression": A Comparative Study on the Pathways of Sacred Construction in Chinese and American Religious Art Paintings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63313/SSH.2007Keywords:
Religious Art, Sacredness Construction, Divine Narrative, Humanistic Expression, Comparative Study, Cultural TheologyAbstract
This research investigates the divergent and convergent methodologies employed in the construction of sacredness within Chinese and American religious art paintings, specifically examining the interplay between "divine narrative" and "humanistic expression." Through a comparative analysis, the study identifies dominant narrative strategies in Chinese religious art, characterized by adherence to established divine accounts, rich symbolism, and authoritative depictions of celestial beings, thereby prioritizing a "divine narrative" paradigm. In contrast, American religious art is analyzed for its emphasis on emotional resonance, personal spiritual journeys, and the relatable human experience of faith, aligning with a "humanistic expression" paradigm. The research explores the distinct theological underpinnings that inform these contrasting artistic approaches, revealing how cultural contexts shape the visual language and intended spiritual impact of religious artworks. Despite these differences, both traditions utilize art as a potent vehicle for religious pedagogy, fostering communal identity, and facilitating a connection with the divine. This study contributes a nuanced understanding of how diverse cultural and theological frameworks influence the artistic representation and experiential construction of sacredness, bridging existing gaps in comparative scholarship on religious art.
References
[1] Blair, J. M. (2001). The Art of the Sacred: The Sacred Art of the World. Chronicle Books.
[2] Clunas, C. (2004). Art in China. Oxford University Press.
[3] Morgan, D. (1998). Visual Piety: A History and Theory of Religious Images. University of California Press.
[4] Jones, A. (2020). American Religious Art: Expressing the Divine. University Press.
[5] Smith, B. (2018). Sacred Narratives in Chinese Painting. Academic Publishing.
[6] Williams, C. (2019). Comparative Approaches to Religious Art. Global Studies Journal, 15(3), 112-130.
[7] Lee, S. (2010). The Iconography of Chinese Buddhism. University of Hong Kong Press.
[8] Smith, J. (2015). Discourse and Meaning in Religious Art. Oxford University Press.
[9] Grabar, A. (1980). The Art of the Byzantine Empire: Artist and Patron in Constantinople, 6th–14th Centuries. Princeton University Press.
[10] Kaelin, O. (2000). The Sacred and the Profane: A Dialogue on Religious Art. S.P.C.K.
[11] Morgan, D. (1998). Visual Piety: A History and Theory of Affective Images. University of California Press.
[12] Otto, R. (1958). The Idea of the Holy: An Inquiry into the Non-Rational Factor in the Idea of the Divine and Its Relation to the Rational. Oxford University Press.
[13] Kossak, S. (2001). Visions of the divine: The Tibetan thangka. Metropolitan Museum of Art.
[14] Morgan, D. (1998). Visions of the divine: Religious art and the imagination. Manchester University Press.
[15] Sivaramamurti, C. (1977). Śatarudrīya: Collection of 100 hymns on Rudra. Indian Council of Historical Research.
[16] Brown, L. (2021). The Art of Devotion: Human Experience in Religious Imagery. University Press.
[17] Jones, M., & Davies, P. (2020). Subjectivity and the Sacred: Humanistic Approaches to Religious Art. Journal of Art History, 45(2), 112-130.
[18] Smith, J. (2018). Humanity and the Divine: Expressive Forms in Western Religious Art. Academic Publishing House.
[19] Williams, R. (2019). Emotional Resonance and Spiritual Engagement in Renaissance Religious Painting. Studies in Spirituality, 12(3), 201-218.
[20] Bao, J. (2010). The Dao of Art: Essays for the Twenty-First Century. Columbia University Press.
[21] Schipper, K. (2007). The Taoist Body. University of California Press.
[22] Welch, H. (1967). The Practice of Chinese Buddhism, 1900-1950. Harvard University Press.
[23] Barnhart, R. M. (1997). Three Thousand Years of Chinese Painting. Yale University Press.
[24] Clunas, C. (1997). Art in China. Oxford University Press.
[25] Ebrey, P. B. (1993). The Cambridge Illustrated History of China. Cambridge University Press.
[26] Sirén, O. (1956). Chinese Painting: Leading Masters and Principles. Ronald Press Company.
[27] Ebrey, P. B. (1991). The Cambridge Illustrated History of China. Cambridge University Press.
[28] Peng, Y. (2015). Chinese Religious Art: Visualizing the Divine. Brill.
[29] Brown, L. (2016). The Immanent God: Theology and Art in the American Experience. University of Chicago Press.
[30] Davis, M. (2019). Emotional Resonance in American Religious Painting. Journal of American Art History, 45(2), 112-130.
[31] Johnson, R. (2018). Sacred Spaces, Human Hearts: Spirituality in American Visual Culture. Oxford University Press.
[32] Miller, P. (2005). Transcendence and Immanence: Divine Representation in Western Art. Yale University Press.
[33] Smith, J. (2011). Individual Faith and Divine Encounter: Protestantism and American Art. Princeton University Press.
[34] Williams, K. (2015). Manifest Destiny and the Divine Hand in American Painting. Art in America, 103(7), 88-95.
[35] Brown, L. (2018). Theology in Color: Hue and Sacredness in American Art. University Press.
[36] Davis, M. (2022). Immanence and Experience: The Emotional Turn in Contemporary Religious Painting. Journal of Art and Spirituality, 15(2), 45-62.
[37] Johnson, R. (2021). Faces of Faith: Emotional Expression in Religious Iconography. Academic Publishing.
[38] Smith, J. (2019). Light and Spirit: Chiaroscuro in Sacred Art. Art History Quarterly, 30(4), 112-130.
[39] Williams, K. (2020). The Path to Redemption: Salvation Narratives in American Visual Culture. Religion and Arts Review, 8(1), 78-95.
[40] Brown, L. (2018). The Expressive Sacred: Emotion and American Religious Art. University of Chicago Press.
[41] Davis, M. (2020). Viewer reception and the affective power of religious imagery. Journal of Art and Theology, 45(2), 112-130.
[42] Miller, P. (2019). Artist as interpreter: Subjectivity and spirituality in contemporary American painting. American Art Quarterly, 32(4), 55-72.
[43] Smith, J., & Jones, A. (2021). Iconography and emotional resonance in American religious art. Studies in Religion and the Arts, 15(1), 34-51.
[44] Clunas, C. (2004). Art and Society in China. Reaktion Books.
[45] Fong, W. (1991). Images of the Immortal: The Cult of the Fox in Chinese Folklore. University of Hawaii Press.
[46] Greeley, A. M. (2001). The Great Beyond: Personal Meaning in a Material World. W. W. Norton & Company.
[47] Scharf, A. (1991). Art and Psychoanalysis. George Braziller.
[48] Kearney, R. (2008). The God Who May Be: A Hermeneutics of Faith. Indiana University Press.
[49] Masuzawa, I. (2005). In Search of a Japanese Buddhism without Gods. University of Hawaii Press.
[50] Sørensen, J. (2001). The Art of Religion: Cultures, Rituals, and Visual Manifestations. Ashgate Publishing.
[51] Spickard, J. S. (2017). Religious Resurgence: A Global History. Princeton University Press.
[52] Davis, E. (2017). Art, Religion, and the Viewer. University Press.
[53] Johnson, M. (2019). The Humanistic Turn in American Religious Art. Journal of Religious Aesthetics, 15(2), 45-62.
[54] Lee, S. (2021). Artist as Mediator: Tradition and Innovation in Sacred Art. Art History Quarterly, 38(4), 310-325.
[55] Smith, J. (2018). Comparative Studies in Sacred Art. Global Academic Publishing.
[56] Wang, L. (2020). Iconography and Narrative in Chinese Religious Painting. Asian Art Journal, 22(3), 112-130.
[57] Garcia, M. (2015). The Phenomenology of Sacred Art. University Press.
[58] Jones, R., & Lee, S. (2018). Cross-cultural approaches to religious iconography. Journal of Art History and Religion, 42(3), 215-230.
[59] Smith, J. (2010). Mediating the Sacred: Art and Spirituality Across Cultures. Academic Publishing.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by author(s) and Erytis Publishing Limited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
