From Parasocial Interaction to Relationship: A Study on Virtual Intimacy in Otome Games——A Case Study of Love and Deepspace
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63313/SSH.9093Keywords:
Parasocial Interaction, Parasocial Relationship, Emotional Communication, Virtual Intimate Relationship, Otome GamesAbstract
In the digital media era, otome games, as a typical carrier of virtual intimate relationships, continuously shape the emotional experience patterns of young people. Based on the parasocial interaction theory, this study adopts in-depth interviews and participant observation to systematically explore the construction mechanism, typological characteristics and influence paths of virtual intimate relationships in such games. The research finds that games effectively promote the development from parasocial interaction to stable parasocial relationships between players and characters through realistic character shaping, narrative-driven plots and immersive scenarios. Virtual relationships are categorized into three types: friendship-oriented, romance-oriented and virtual-pet-oriented, which expand the typological dimension of traditional parasocial relationship (PSR) theory. Such relationships exert dual influences: they satisfy psychological needs through emotional compensation and identity recognition, while also triggering negative effects such as media dependence and excessive consumption due to emotional capitalization.This study provides a theoretical reference for understanding the complexity of digital emotional interaction, and offers implications for the ethical governance and healthy design of games.
References
[1] Zhu Lili, Han Yichen. Mimetic intimacy: A new observation on fan communities of nurturing idols—Taking TFboys as a case[J]. Contemporary Communication, 2017(06):72-76.
[2] Li Huawei, Xu Kaibin. Information penetration and power game: Research on the role of social media in young people’s intimate relationships—Based on the stage theory of relationship development[J]. Chinese Youth Studies, 2022(06):48-58+47. DOI:10.19633/j.cnki.11-2579/d.2022.0088.
[3] Xiong Jianfeng. A study on college students’ intimate relationship satisfaction and its correlation with attachment types[D]. Jiangxi Normal University, 2008.
[4] Hou Jing, Song Lei. Adult attachment and intimate relationship quality among college couples: The mediating effect of attribution[J]. Journal of Capital Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2019(02):169-180.
[5] Kirchler E, Rodler C, Hoezl E, et al. Conflict and decision-making in close relationships: Love, money and daily routines[M]. East Sussex: Psychology Press, 2001:39-47.
[6] Gao Hanning. Experimental field of intimate relationships: Female-oriented cyberspace and cultural production[J]. Literary Theory and Criticism, 2020(03):127-139. DOI:10.16532/j.cnki.1002-9583.2020.03.013.
[7] Lin Zhongxuan, Wu Qili. From emotional labor to emotional transaction: The commodification practice of emotions among virtual lovers[J]. Chinese Youth Studies, 2023(02):84-92+100. DOI:10.19633/j.cnki.11-2579/d.2023.0018.
[8] Liu Shengzhi, Shi Bingrong. Utopian experiment of intimate relationships: A cultural study on virtual idol worship among youth groups[J]. Chinese Youth Studies, 2022(11):5-12+69. DOI:10.19633/j.cnki.11-2579/d.2022.0148.
[9] Fu Senhui. Digital intimacy: A study on intimate relationships in virtual idol worship[J]. Journal of Fujian Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024(02):118-128+171.
[10] Horton D, Wohl R R. Mass communication and para-social interaction[J]. Psychiatry, 1956, 19:215-229.
[11] Rosengren K E, Windahl S, Hakansson P A, et al. Adolescents' TV relations: Three scales[J]. Communication Research, 1976(4):347-366.
[12] Nordlund J E. Media interaction[J]. Communication Research, 1978(2):150-175.
[13] Rubin A M, Perse E M, Powell R A. Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing[J]. Human Communication Research, 1985, 12(2):155-180.
[14] Schramm H, Hartmann T. The PSI-Process Scales. A new measure to assess the intensity and breadth of para-social processes[J]. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 2008(33):385-401.
[15] Wellman M L. Trans-mediated parasocial relationships: Private Facebook groups foster influencer–follower connection[J]. New Media & Society, 2020:1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820958719.
[16] Stein J P, Breves P L, Anders N. Parasocial interactions with real and virtual influencers: The role of perceived similarity and human-likeness[J]. New Media & Society, 2022:1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221102900.
[17] Fang Jianyi, Ge Jinping, Zhang Jie. Deficit paradigm or universal paradigm—A review of parasocial interaction research[J]. Journalism & Communication Research, 2006(03):68-72+95-96.
[18] Yin Junli, Chen Dongxia. Research progress on parasocial relationships between audiences and media figures—A new perspective of audience psychological research in China[J]. Journalism World, 2011(08):26-28+47. DOI:10.15897/j.cnki.cn51-1046/g2.2011.08.016.
[19] Ma Zhihao, Ge Jinping. A bullet screen comment analysis of Japanese animation: From the perspective of parasocial interaction[J]. International Journal of Journalism, 2014, 36(08):116-130. DOI:10.13495/j.cnki.cjjc.2014.08.008.
[20] Han Xiu, Zhang Hongzhong, He Kang, et al. The masking effect of media dependency: Does higher parasocial interaction with social robots lead to greater loneliness?[J]. International Journal of Journalism, 2021, 43(09):25-48. DOI:10.13495/j.cnki.cjjc.2021.09.002.
[21] Hartmann T, Schramm H, Klimmt C, et al. Personenorientierte Medienrezeption: Ein Zwei-Ebenen-Modell parasozialer Interaktionen[J]. Publizistik, 2004(1):25-47.
[22] Klimmt C, Hartmann T, Schramm H. Parasocial interactions and relationships[J]. Psychology of Entertainment, 2006:291-313.
[23] Tukachinsky R. Para-romantic love and para-friendships: Development and assessment of a multiple-parasocial relationships scale[J]. 2010.
[24] Ni Ting, Zhang Liting. Emotional connection under parasocial interaction—Marketing exploration and reflection of otome games[J]. Digital Publishing Research, 2023(S2):99-105.
[25] Li Yujie, Wang Wei. Analysis on community marketing model of mobile game Love and Producer[J]. Market Weekly (Theoretical Research), 2018(04):72-74.
[26] Wu Yue, Yuennan Sun, Zhu Ning, et al. The influence of otome games on female players’ ideal view of love[J]. Youth Studies, 2020(04):56-70+96.
[27] Peng Jiawen, Wang Jingyi, Yang Xuefang, et al. Research on the guidance and communication strategy of female college students’ love values from the perspective of game theory—Based on a case study of otome game groups[J]. Journal of News Research Guide, 2023, 14(01):97-100.
[28] Chen Chen, Zhang Yang. Virtual intimate relationships in emotional narration of otome games—A study based on Love and Deepspace and young female players[J]. Chinese Youth Studies, 2024(08):24-33+23. DOI:10.19633/j.cnki.11-2579/d.2024.0105.
[29] Huo Lianbin, Mi Dan. Alternative satisfaction: User research on mobile game Love and Producer from the perspective of intimate relationships[J]. Southeast Communication, 2018(06):112-115. DOI:10.13556/j.cnki.dncb.cn35-1274/j.2018.06.037.
[30] Liu Liang, Zhang Shuning, Liu Guiyun, et al. A study on parasocial relationships between players and virtual lovers in otome games[J]. Science and Technology Communication, 2021, 13(17):150-154. DOI:10.16607/j.cnki.1674-6708.2021.17.046.
[31] Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology[J]. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2006, 3(2):77-101.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by author(s) and Erytis Publishing Limited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
