A Diachronic Transitivity Analysis on China Daily’s Coverage of the 2018 and 2025 China-US Trade Disputes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63313/SSH.9015Keywords:
China-US trade dispute, media discourse, transitivity analysis, systemic functional linguistics, Actor–Goal construction, China DailyAbstract
This study conducts a diachronic transitivity analysis of China Daily’s coverage of the 2018 and 2025 China-US trade disputes, focusing on material processes and Actor–Goal constructions. Findings show that material processes dominate, emphasizing tangible actions such as tariffs and negotiations. In 2018, China is portrayed as cooperative and responsible, while the US appears coercive; by 2025, the US emerges as the primary instigator, and China adopts a defensive–counteractive–constructive stance. Overall, the newspaper strategically frames national agency and accountability, reinforcing China’s legitimacy and strategic image in international economic governance.
References
[1] Bown, C. P. (2021). The US–China trade war and Phase One agreement. Journal of Policy Modeling, 43(4), 805–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2021.02.009
[2] Bown, C. P., & Keynes, S. (2020). Why Trump Shot the Sheriffs: the End of WTO Dispute Settlement 1.0. Journal of Policy Modeling, 42(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2020.03.006
[3] [email protected]. (2025, August 14). US-China trade war: explanation and impact on the supply chain. Retrieved August 16, 2025, from CTI SRL website: https://www.cti-fwd.com/en/news/us-china-trade-war-explanation-and-impact-on-logistics/
[4] Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Routledge.
[5] Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Ed-ward Arnold.
[6] Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3nd ed). London: Ar-nold
[7] Hu, Y., & Li, Y. (2023). A Study of Legitimizing Media Discourse from the Perspective of Discourse-Historical Approach: A Comparative Study of Trade Friction Reporting on Si-no-American Mainstream Media. Foreign Languages and Literature, 39(04), 92–101.
[8] Liu, W., & Hu, Y. (2020). From Situation to Context: A Critical Cognitive Analysis of Trump Administration’s Trade Policy Agenda. Foreign Languages and Literature, 9-18(36). 01. Retrieved from 01.
[9] Ma, T., & Gao, Y. (2020). Multimodal Metaphor Construction and Critical Analysis of Amer-ican Political Cartoons: The case of the U.S.-China Trade Conflict. Foreign Languages Re-search, 37(01), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.13978/j.cnki.wyyj.2020.01.005
[10] Ma, W.., & Cui, Y. (2020). A Corpus-Based Study on China’s National Image: A Transitivity Perspective. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language, (05), 114–121.
[11] Song, Y., & Wang, D. (2024). A Diachronic Critical Metaphor Analysis of American Eco-nomic News Reports on China. Foreign Languages Research, 41(02), 14-21+43. https://doi.org/10.13978/j.cnki.wyyj.2024.02.008.
[12] Wu, J., Xie, S., & Li, J. (2022). Investigating Legitimization in Political Discourse from the Perspective of CMA: An Analysis of the US Governmental Discourse on China-US Trade Talks. Contemporary Foreign Language Studies, (04), 111–122.
[13] Xu, Y., & Lams, L. (2023). On the mechanisms of presuppositions in Chinese media narra-tives about the Sino-US trade conflict. East Asian Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.19566
[14] Yang, M., & Shi, Y. (2021). Discursive Legitimization of Launching the Sino-US Trade War by the US Government:A Corpus-based Historical Discourse Analysis. Foreign Languages Research, 38(03), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.13978/j.cnki.wyyj.2021.03.006.
[15] Zhang, C. (2021). The Sino–US trade war in political cartoons: A synthesis of semiotic, cog-nitive, and cultural perspectives. Intercultural Pragmatics, 18(4), 469–497. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2021-400
[16] Zhang, C., & Forceville, C. (2020). Metaphor and metonymy in Chinese and American polit-ical cartoons (2018–2019) about the Sino-US trade conflict. Pragmatics and Cognition, 27(2), 474–499. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.20013.zha
[17] Zhou, C., & Liu, D. (2024). A Study of Rhetorical Discourse Games in News Editorials about Sino-US Trade Friction. Contemporary Foreign Language Studies, (01), 113–124.
[18] Zhou, L., & You, Z. (2022). Construction Deontic Stance in Chinese White Papers on Chi-na-US Trade Disputes. Contemporary Foreign Language Studies, (06), 95–105.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by author(s) and Erytis Publishing Limited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
