Shifting Perspectives in Gamification Research

Authors

  • Laixi Wei College of Publishing, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China Author
  • Runsheng Miao College of Publishing, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63313/SSH.9143

Keywords:

Gamification, Sustainability, Public Governance, Participatory Culture

Abstract

Gamification has become an important topic in research on digital media, information systems, behavioral design, and public communication. This article uses a bibliometric-informed narrative review to examine highly cited English-language studies, systematic reviews of gamification for sustainability, and Chinese research on gamified ecological science communication. It synthesizes the field's knowledge structure and theoretical development. The review identifies ten interrelated shifts. At the conceptual level, research has moved from game elements to gameful experience. At the mechanistic level, it has moved from extrinsic rewards to psychological need satisfaction and motivational affordances. At the functional level, it has moved from single outcome measures to a multilayered analysis of engagement, motivation, social interaction, experience, and awareness. Applications have also expanded across sustainability, education, health, marketing and services, organizational management, public governance, and participatory culture. Together, these shifts show that gamification research is moving beyond the question of whether particular elements work and toward an explanation of how gamification organizes motivation, interaction, emotion, identity, and social meaning in specific platform contexts. Future research should examine long-term effects and contextual variation while giving greater attention to user types, ethical risks, and computational communication methods.

References

[1] AlSkaif, T., Lampropoulos, I., van den Broek, M. and van Sark, W. (2018) Gamification-Based Framework for Engagement of Residential Customers in Energy Applications. Energy Research & Social Science, 44, 187-195.

[2] Aubert, A.H., Medema, W. and Wals, A.E.J. (2019) Towards a Framework for Designing and Assessing Game-Based Approaches for Sustainable Water Governance. Water, 11(4).

[3] Bakhanova, E., Garcia, J., Raffe, W. and Voinov, A. (2020) Targeting Social Learning and Engagement: What Serious Games and Gamification Can Offer to Participatory Modeling. Environmental Modelling & Software, 134.

[4] Buckley, P. and Doyle, E. (2017) Individualising Gamification: An Investigation of the Impact of Learning Styles and Personality Traits on the Efficacy of Gamification. Computers & Education, 106, 43-55.

[5] Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R. and Nacke, L. (2011) From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining Gamification. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference, 9-15.

[6] Dichev, C. and Dicheva, D. (2017) Gamifying Education: What Is Known, What Is Believed and What Remains Uncertain. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-36.

[7] Douglas, B.D. and Brauer, M. (2021) Gamification to Prevent Climate Change: A Review of Games and Apps for Sustainability. Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 89-94.

[8] Fernandez Galeote, D., Legaki, N.Z. and Hamari, J. (2023) Text- and Game-Based Communication for Climate Change Attitude, Self-Efficacy, and Behavior: A Controlled Experiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 149.

[9] Frias-Jamilena, D.M., Fernandez-Ruano, M.L. and Polo-Pena, A.I. (2022) Gamified Environmental Interpretation as a Strategy for Improving Tourist Behavior in Support of Sustainable Tourism. Tourism Management, 91.

[10] Gatti, L., Ulrich, M. and Seele, P. (2019) Education for Sustainable Development through Business Simulation Games: An Exploratory Study of Sustainability Gamification and Its Effects on Students’ Learning Outcomes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 667-678.

[11] Hamari, J. and Koivisto, J. (2015) Why Do People Use Gamification Services? International Journal of Information Management, 35(4), 419-431.

[12] Hamari, J., Koivisto, J. and Sarsa, H. (2014) Does Gamification Work? A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification. Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3025-3034.

[13] Hofacker, C.F., de Ruyter, K., Lurie, N.H., Manchanda, P. and Donaldson, J. (2016) Gamification and Mobile Marketing Effectiveness. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 34, 25-36.

[14] Huotari, K. and Hamari, J. (2017) A Definition for Gamification: Anchoring Gamification in the Service Marketing Literature. Electronic Markets, 27(1), 21-31.

[15] Koivisto, J. and Hamari, J. (2019) The Rise of Motivational Information Systems: A Review of Gamification Research. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 191-210.

[16] Lan, X., Song, B. and Kiousis, S. (2023) Gamifying Public Engagement on Sustainability Issues: From Motivational Affordances to the Effectiveness of Symmetrical Public Relations. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction.

[17] Landers, R.N. (2014) Developing a Theory of Gamified Learning. Simulation & Gaming, 45(6), 752-768.

[18] Lister, C., West, J.H., Cannon, B., Sax, T. and Brodegard, D. (2014) Just a Fad? Gamification in Health and Fitness Apps. JMIR Serious Games, 2(2).

[19] Mabalay, A.A. (2025) Gamification for Sustainability: A Systematic Review of Applications, Trends, and Opportunities. Computers in Human Behavior, 165, 108529.

[20] Mekler, E.D., Bruehlmann, F., Tuch, A.N. and Opwis, K. (2017) Towards Understanding the Effects of Individual Gamification Elements on Intrinsic Motivation and Performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 525-534.

[21] Mulcahy, R., Russell-Bennett, R. and Iacobucci, D. (2020) Designing Gamified Apps for Sustainable Consumption: A Field Study. Journal of Business Research, 106, 377-387.

[22] Nacke, L.E. and Deterding, S. (2017) The Maturing of Gamification Research. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 450-454.

[23] Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 Statement. Systematic Reviews, 10, 89.

[24] Rapp, A., Hopfgartner, F., Hamari, J., Linehan, C. and Cena, F. (2019) Strengthening Gamification Studies: Current Trends and Future Opportunities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 127, 1-6.

[25] Riar, M., Morschheuser, B., Zarnekow, R. and Hamari, J. (2022) Gamification of Cooperation: A Framework, Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 67.

[26] Ro, M., Brauer, M., Kuntz, K., Shukla, R. and Bensch, I. (2017) Making Cool Choices for Sustainability: Testing the Effectiveness of a Game-Based Approach to Promoting Pro-Environmental Behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 20-30.

[27] Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L. (2000) Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.

[28] Sailer, M., Hense, J.U., Mayr, S.K. and Mandl, H. (2017) How Gamification Motivates. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371-380.

[29] Seaborn, K. and Fels, D.I. (2015) Gamification in Theory and Action: A Survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 14-31.

[30] Snyder, H. (2019) Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.

[31] Tondello, G.F., Wehbe, R.R., Diamond, L., Busch, M., Marczewski, A. and Nacke, L.E. (2016) The Gamification User Types Hexad Scale. Proceedings of CHI PLAY, 229-243.

[32] Whittaker, L., Mulcahy, R. and Russell-Bennett, R. (2021) Go with the Flow for Gamification and Sustainability Marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 61.

[33] Xi, N. and Hamari, J. (2019) Does Gamification Satisfy Needs? International Journal of Information Management, 46, 210-221.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-09

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Shifting Perspectives in Gamification Research. (2026). Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(3), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.63313/SSH.9143