A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT Feedback on Underachieving Students’ Writing Ability in Senior High School English Instruction

Lanqiao Zhou

doi:10.63313/IJED.9008

Authors

Lanqiao Zhou China West Normal University, Nanchong 637000, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63313/IJED.9008

Keywords:

ChatGPT, Writing feedback, Case study

Abstract

This case study investigates the influence of ChatGPT-generated feedback on the writing abilities of an underachieving senior high school student in China. Over a six-week period, the participant engaged in weekly writing tasks, used ChatGPT for iterative revisions, and submitted final drafts for teacher evaluation. Data were collected through writing scores, semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and student reflective logs. Results indicate measurable gains in grammatical accuracy, organizational coherence, and writing confidence, alongside increased use of varied vocabulary and transitional devices. However, evidence of potential overdependence on AI suggestions highlights the need for structured pedagogical frameworks. The study offers practical recommendations for integrating AI-assisted feedback into English writing instruction to support low-performing learners.

References

[1] Attali, Y., & Burstein, J. (2006). Automated essay scoring with e-rater® V.2. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 4(3), 1-30.

[2] Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency.

[3] Brookhart, S. M. (2017). How to Give Effective Feedback to Your Students (2nd ed.). ASCD.

[4] Chen, L., & Zhao, M. (2023). Exploring the Educational Potential of ChatGPT in Second Language Writing. Language Teaching Research, 27(1), 45-59.

[5] Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Re-search (3rd ed.). SAGE.

[6] Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge Univer-sity Press.

[7] Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective Feedback and Teacher Development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3-18.

[8] Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Stu-dents. Routledge.

[9] Harmer, J. (2015). The Practice of English Language Teaching (5th ed.). Pearson.

[10] Hyland, K. (2003). Second Language Writing. Cambridge University Press.

[11] Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To Give is Better than to Receive: The Benefits of Peer Review to the Reviewer’s Own Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 30-43.

[12] Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. SAGE.

[13] Ware, P. (2014). Technology and Second Language Writing: A Framework for Feedback in the Language Classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 16-31.

[14] Wen, Qiufang. (2016). Learning characteristics and teaching strategies for students with low English achievement. Educational Research, 35(2), 45-50.

[15] Wang, Qiang. (2012). A study on the feedback mechanism in English writing teaching. For-eign Languages Teaching and Research, 4, 123-128.