Community Structure of Benthic Macroinvertebrates and its Relationship with Environmental Factors in Wetlands of Jinan City: A Multi-Type Comparative Analysis

Authors

  • Jiaxin Liu College of Fisheries and Life Science, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian, 116000, China Author
  • Mi Wang College of Fisheries and Life Science, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian, 116000, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63313/SD.9005

Keywords:

Jinan wetlands, Benthic macroinvertebrates, Bioindicator, Suspended solids, Eutrophication, Ecological health assessment, CCA

Abstract

Wetlands are biodiversity hotspots that provide essential ecosystem services, yet they are increasingly degraded by anthropogenic pressures. Benthic macroinvertebrates are reliable bioindicators of wetland health, but systematic cross-comparisons of their communities across different wetland types within a specific region remain limited. This study conducted a three-year survey (2020–2022) across 90 sampling sites within 5 national and 10 provincial wetlands in Jinan City, comprehensively assessing water environmental factors and macroinvertebrate assemblages. Using multivariate statistical methods, we identified key environmental drivers and evaluated integrated ecosystem health. Results revealed pronounced spatial heterogeneity in water quality, with suspended solids (SS) emerging as the most pervasive stressor (present in 100% of wetlands’ PCA profiles). A total of 116 macroinvertebrate species were recorded, predominantly Mollusca and Insecta. National-level wetlands harbored significantly higher species richness and Shannon-Wiener diversity (mean 20.2 species, H′=2.01) than provincial counterparts (14.7 species, H′=1.28). Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) demonstrated that SS, total phosphorus (TP), and transparency (SD) were the principal determinants of community structure, although a clear dichotomy was observed: lake-type wetlands were primarily governed by TP and SD, whereas riverine wetlands were driven by SS and total nitrogen (TN). A comprehensive health index (DB 3701/T 33-2022) classified only Shandong Jixi National Wetland Park as "healthy" (score 81.28), while nine wetlands were "sub-healthy" and five, predominantly in the Jiyang region, were "unhealthy." This first systematic, multi-type comparison underscores the primacy of particle pollution as a regional ecological filter and delivers a robust scientific basis for differentiated conservation and targeted restoration strategies for Jinan’s wetlands.

References

[1] Mitsch, W. J., & Gosselink, J. G. (2015). Wetlands (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

[2] Merritt, R. W., Cummins, K. W., & Berg, M. B. (2017). An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America (5th ed.). Kendall Hunt.

[3] Hilsenhoff, W. L. (1987). An improved biotic index of organic stream pollution. Great Lakes Entomologist, 20(1), 31-39.

[4] Benke, A. C. (1984). Secondary production of aquatic insects. In V. H. Resh & D. M. Rosenberg (Eds.), The ecology of aquatic insects (pp. 289-322). Praeger.

[5] Duran, M., & Suicmez, M. (2007). Utilization of both macroinvertebrate and physicochemical parameters to evaluate the water quality of River Kızılırmak. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 128, 233-240.

[6] Morse, J. C., Yang, L. F., & Tian, L. X. (1994). Aquatic insects of China useful for monitoring water quality. Hohai University Press.

[7] Kawai, T., & Tanida, K. (2005). Aquatic insects of Japan: manual with keys and illustrations. Tokai University Press.

[8] Berger, W. H., & Parker, F. L. (1970). Diversity of planktonic foraminifera in deep-sea sediments. Science, 168(3937), 1345-1347.

[9] Bilotta, G. S., & Brazier, R. E. (2008). Understanding the influence of suspended solids on water quality and aquatic biota. Water Research, 42(12), 2849-2861.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Community Structure of Benthic Macroinvertebrates and its Relationship with Environmental Factors in Wetlands of Jinan City: A Multi-Type Comparative Analysis. (2026). Sustainable Development, 1(2), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.63313/SD.9005