A Corpus-based Descriptive Study of Adversative Connectives in High School Students’ English Writing: A Case Study of a Senior High School in Nanchong
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63313/EH.9109Keywords:
Adversative Connectives, Corpus-Based Study, High School English Writing, Discourse Cohesion, EFL Learners, Discourse Competence, Examination WritingAbstract
This study explores the use of adversative connectives in high school students’ English writing through a corpus-based descriptive approach. The data were collected from a mid-term examination conducted in a public senior high school in China, including two types of writing tasks: a practical writing task and a narrative writing task. By analyzing students’ written texts, the study examines the frequency and contextual appropriateness of adversative connectives. The analysis shows that students rely heavily on a limited number of high-frequency adversative connectives, particularly but, while other connectives such as however and although are used far less frequently. Although many instances of adversative connectives are employed appropriately to express contrast or concession, mechanical and unnecessary uses are also identified. These problems indicate that students may possess basic awareness of contrastive relations but lack sufficient control over connective variety and discourse-level appropriateness. From a pedagogical perspective, the findings suggest that English writing instruction in high school should place greater emphasis on discourse-level features, especially the functional use of connectives in context. The study aims to provide practical insights for improving writing instruction and assessment in examination-oriented classrooms.
References
[1] Anthony, L. (2019) AntConc (Version 3.5.8). Waseda University, Tokyo.
[2] Beaugrande, R. de and Dressler, W. (1981) Introduction to Text Linguistics. Longman, London.
[3] Biber, D., Conrad, S. and Reppen, R. (1998) Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[4] Biber, D., Gray, B. and Poonpon, K. (2011) Should We Use Characteristics of Conversation to Measure Grammatical Complexity? Applied Linguistics, 32, 5-35.
[5] Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. (2013) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Pearson, London.
[6] Celce-Murcia, M. and Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999) The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course. Heinle & Heinle, Boston.
[7] Chen, L. (2006) Connective Use in L2 Learners’ Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 1-28.
[8] Crossley, S.A. and McNamara, D.S. (2010) Cohesion, Coherence, and Expert Evaluations of Writing Proficiency. Discourse Processes, 47, 1-30.
[9] Crossley, S.A., Kyle, K. and McNamara, D.S. (2016) The Development and Use of Cohesive Devices in L2 Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 1-17.
[10] de Bot, K., Lowie, W. and Verspoor, M. (2007) A Dynamic Systems Theory Approach to Second Language Acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7-21.
[11] Ellis, R. (2008) The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[12] Field, Y. and Yip, L.M.O. (1992) A Comparison of Internal Conjunctive Cohesion in the English Essay Writing of Cantonese Speakers and Native Speakers of English. RELC Journal, 23, 15-28.
[13] Fraser, B. (1999) What Are Discourse Markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 931-952.
[14] Granger, S. (2003) The International Corpus of Learner English. Applied Linguistics, 24, 538-556.
[15] Halliday, M.A.K. (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold, London.
[16] Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. Longman, London.
[17] Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, R. (1989) Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[18] Hosseinpur, R.M. and Pour, H.H. (2022) Adversative Connectors Use in EFL and Native Students’ Writing: A Contrastive Analysis. Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal, 26, 1-18.
[19] Kyle, K. (2016) Measuring Syntactic Development in L2 Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 34, 1-17.
[20] Lan, G. and Sun, Y. (2019) Syntactic Complexity Development in EFL Writing. System, 82, 1-12.
[21] Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997) Chaos/Complexity Science and Second Language Acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18, 141-165.
[22] Larsen-Freeman, D. and Cameron, L. (2008) Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[23] McCarthy, M. (1991) Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[24] McEnery, T. and Hardie, A. (2012) Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[25] McNamara, D.S., Louwerse, M.M., McCarthy, P.M. and Graesser, A.C. (2010) Coh-Metrix: Capturing Linguistic Features of Cohesion. Discourse Processes, 47, 292-330.
[26] Milton, J. and Tsang, E.S.C. (1993) A Corpus-based Study of Logical Connectors in EFL Students’ Writing. System, 21, 215-226.
[27] Nunan, D. (1993) Introducing Discourse Analysis. Penguin, London.
[28] Park, S.J. (2024) Contrastive Connector Usage Patterns in English Writing by Korean Learners. The Journal of Studies in Language, 40, 205-215.
[29] Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman, London.
[30] Schiffrin, D. (1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[31] Verspoor, M., Lowie, W. and van Dijk, M. (2008) Variability in Second Language Development from a Dynamic Systems Perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 214-231.
[32] Yang, W. and Sun, Y. (2012) The Use of Cohesive Devices in Argumentative Writing by Chinese EFL Learners at Different Proficiency Levels. Linguistics and Education, 23, 31-48.
[33] Chu, L.L. and Zhao, C.F. (2011) A Study on the Use of Adversative Connectives in English Argumentative Writing of Engineering College Students: Based on a Self-built Corpus. Foreign Language World, 5, 9-15.
[34] Cao, Z.F. (2025) A Corpus-based Study of Logical Connectives in Continuation Writing of Senior High School English. Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by author(s) and Erytis Publishing Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.













