Exploring a Metacognitive Selective Reading Strategy Under Time Pressure —	A Study of Introductory Professional Texts for STEM Students

Minmin Tu; Yiqi Yu; Ximin Yin

doi:10.63313/EH.9118

Authors

Minmin Tu University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China Author
Yiqi Yu University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China Author
Ximin Yin University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63313/EH.9118

Keywords:

Metacognitive Strategies, Time Pressure, Reading Efficiency, Professional English Reading, Information Selection

Abstract

Reading under time pressure requires readers to balance comprehension accuracy with processing speed, yet limited attention has been paid to how metacognitive strategy instruction affects this balance. Drawing on metacognitive theory, this study developed a Three-stage Metacognitive Selective Reading Strategy to support STEM students in reading introductory professional English texts. A single-group pre-post design was adopted, involving 22 STEM freshmen. Participants completed a reading comprehension test before and after a one-week interval during which they watched a 10-minute instructional video on effective reading strategies. Reading accuracy, response time, and overall reading efficiency were measured respectively. The results showed no statistically significant changes in accuracy, response time, or reading efficiency after the deliberate interval. The near-perfect pre-test accuracy suggests that a ceiling effect may have limited the sensitivity of the accuracy measure. In addition, the short training period and the cognitive demands involved in applying an unfamiliar strategy may have prevented participants from integrating the strategy into their existing reading processes. These findings suggest that brief exposure to a metacognitive reading strategy may not produce immediate improvements among relatively proficient readers and highlight the need for longer training periods and more sensitive measures of reading performance.

References

[1] Xu, Y. M, Shang, T. T., Yan, M., Du, Y. Y., Wang, X., & Zhang, Z. X. (2018) The effects of time pressure and presentation medium on reading performance and metacognition. In proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Psychology (eds.), Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Normal University.

[2] Yan, M. (2018) The effects of time pressure and presentation medium on reading performance and metacognition [D]. Zhejiang Normal University.

[3] Binbasaran Tuysuzoglu, B., & Greene, J. A. (2014) An investigation of the role of contingent metacognitive behavior in self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 10(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9126-y

[4] Flavell, J. H. (1979) Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906

[5] Haryono, P. (2023) Implementation of Metacognitive Strategies on Students’ Ability to Read English Texts. Sustainable Jurnal Kajian Mutu Pendidikan, 6(2), 543–548. https://doi.org/10.32923/kjmp.v6i2.3770

[6] Ishak, M., Oderinde, I., & Ahmad, S. (2025) The role of metacognitive strategies in enhancing learning outcomes and educational efficiency: A systematic review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed method studies. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development.

[7] Jang, E., Seo, Y.S. & Brutt-Griffler, J. (2025) The mediating effect of metacognitive strategies on the relationship between reading motivation and reading achievement in multilingual and english-dominant students. Read Writ 38, 1271–1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10555-2

[8] Mekuria, A., Bushisho, E. W., & Wubshet, H. (2024) The effects of reading strategy training on students’ reading strategy use and critical reading ability in EFL reading classes. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2310444

[9] Meschino L. (2011) Studying Journal Articles under Time Pressure[D]. University of Waterloo.

[10] Nobutoshi, M. (2023) Metacognition and Reflective Teaching: A Synergistic Approach to Fostering Critical Thinking Skills. Research and Advances in Education, 2(9), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.56397/rae.2023.09.01

[11] Novia, H., Kaniawati, I., Rusli, A., & Rusdiana, D. (2019) The development of metacognitive awareness related to the implementation of metacognitive-based learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1170, 012034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1170/1/012034

[12] Orthey, R., Palena, N., Vrij, A., Meijer, E., Leal, S., Blank, H., & Caso, L. (2019) Effects of time pressure on strategy selection and strategy execution in forced choice tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(5), 974–979. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3592

[13] Partosa, J. D. (2012) Using Metacognition as a Tool to Advance Reading Comprehension in a Science Class. In Biology Education for Social and Sustainable Development (pp. 86–96). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-927-5_8

[14] Perry, J., Lundie, D., & Golder, G. (2018) Metacognition in schools: what does the literature suggest about the effectiveness of teaching metacognition in schools? Educational Review, 71(4), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1441127

[15] Pirolli, P., & Card, S. (1999) Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106(4), 643-675.

[16] Seitz, F. I., von Helversen, B., Albrecht, R., Rieskamp, J., & Jarecki, J. B. (2023) Testing three coping strategies for time pressure in categorizations and similarity judgments. Cognition, 233, 105358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105358

[17] Staus, N. L., O’Connell, K., & Storksdieck, M. (2021) Addressing the Ceiling Effect when Assessing STEM Out-Of-School Time Experiences. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.690431

[18] Sweller, J. (2024) Cognitive load theory and individual differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 110, 102423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102423

[19] Travero, A. S., M. Castrodes, C., & B. Panganiban, P. J. (2025) Students’ Perceptions of Feynman Technique in Mathematics Learning: A Case of a State University in Claveria, Misamis Oriental. Research and Analysis Journal, 8(06), 01–05. https://doi.org/10.18535/raj.v8i06.535

[20] Urban, M., Urban, K., & Nietfeld, J. L. (2023) The effect of a distributed metacognitive strategy intervention on reading comprehension. Metacognition and Learning, 18(2), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09334-1

[21] Waris, O., Fellman, D., Jylkka, J., & Laine, M. (2021) Stimulus novelty, task demands, and strategy use in episodic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(5), 872-888. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820980301