ESLA in Senior High School Spoken English Teaching: Dilemmas and Solutions

Authors

  • Jia Liu School of Foreign Languages, China West Normal University, Nanchong, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63313/IJSSEH.9037

Keywords:

ELSA, Intelligent Speech-Assisted Tool, Spoken English Teaching, Speech Recognition

Abstract

This study focuses on the adaptation issues of ELSA (English Language Speech Assistant), an artificial intelligence speech-assisted tool, in senior high school spoken English teaching. Through a systematic analysis of three dimensions—educational adaptability, technical accuracy, and teaching interactivity—it reveals the core deficiencies of ELSA in the specialized training for the Gaokao spoken English test, classroom management support, and the depth of cultural teaching. The findings indicate that ELSA currently suffers from critical problems such as insufficient adaptation to Gaokao question types, recognition bias of dialectal accents, delayed real-time feedback, and lack of teacher-student interaction, making it difficult to meet the demands of core literacy-oriented senior high school English teaching. To address these problems, this study proposes a multi-level optimization strategy: in terms of educational adaptability, develop a specialized module for the Gaokao spoken English test and enhance the teacher-end management functions; in terms of technical accuracy, construct a "semantic-phonetic" joint model and optimize the real-time feedback system; in terms of teaching interactivity, reconstruct the educational value of gamification and innovate a multimodal integration model. Verified by the strategies, this study provides a theoretical framework for the localized upgrading of ELSA and a practical paradigm for the in-depth integration of AI educational technology in senior high school English teaching, which is of significant reference value for promoting the organic integration of intelligent technology and the cultivation of core competencies in the English discipline.

References

[1] Yang, W., & Yu, P. (2024). Research on the current situation and countermeasures of artificial intelligence empowering college English classroom teaching evaluation. Journal of Hubei Open Vocational College, 37(8), 139–141.

[2] Xu, J. J., & Zhao, C. (2024). The role of large language models in English teaching. Foreign Language Education Research Frontiers, 7(1), 3–10, 90.

[3] Wang, Q., & Chen, Z. H. (2019). Measurement, evaluation and teaching improvement of English subject competence under the background of core literacy. China Examinations, (3), 13.

[4] Xu, W. (2021). Practice of oral assessment in large-scale high-stakes examinations—A case study of Shanghai college entrance examination English listening and speaking test. Foreign Language Testing and Teaching, (1), 21–27.

[5] Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2020). General high school English curriculum standard (2017 ed., revised 2020). People's Education Press.

[6] Xiao, C. C. (2014). A brief discussion on the influence of Sichuan dialect phonetic characteristics on English pronunciation. English Teachers, 14(11), 68–72.

[7] Guo, J. C., Zheng, Y., Wang, X. Z., et al. (2025). Promotion strategies of daily academic motivation resilience among middle school students. Teaching and Administration, (12), 66–71.

[8] Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018). Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 51(3), 285–329.

[9] Gao, R. J. (2025). Problems sorting and practical exploration of senior high school oral English teaching. Ningxia Education, (Z1), 136–137.

[10] Yan, Y. F. (2024). Effective practice of group cooperative learning in junior high school English classrooms. English Campus, (24), 115–117.

[11] Shao, C. L. (2024). Application of multimodal teaching mode in junior high school English teaching. Education Circle, (31), 26–28.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

ESLA in Senior High School Spoken English Teaching: Dilemmas and Solutions. (2026). International Journal of Social Science, Education and Humanities, 2(2), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.63313/IJSSEH.9037